
Imagine a Premier League of cranks and conspiracy theorists. Who do you reckon would top it? It’s a tough call. I think Holocaust deniers would lift the cup, with 9/11 truthers not far behind. But there’s a new lot on the rise, recently promoted from Division One: global warming sceptics. Fuelled by the hype surrounding Climategate, those who believe that climate change has nothing to do with mankind’s release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere have had a storming week – led, in case you hadn’t noticed, by our very own James Delingpole.
Well, brilliant though he is, Delingpole’s about as much of a scientist as he is the captain of the England rugby team. So I was delighted to readHugo Rifkind expertly ribbing him in this week’s Spectator:
Where has it come from, this sudden consensus among Britain’s right-wing punditry that there’s some kind of scam going on here? Yes, Delingpole, I mean you, and plenty of others, too. What gives you the right? It’s like your hairdresser diagnosing multiple sclerosis… I’ve watched it develop and spread over the past couple of years, first with amusement, then with alarm, and now with a sort of horrified panic. Guys, you’re not just fiddling while Rome burns. You’re actively going out and smashing up the fire engines. You’re terrifying me.
Rifkind is also spot on about Climategate: “So some of them are crooks. It’s like giving up on doctors because of Harold Shipman.” There’s no point, in other words, pretending the Climategate emails aren’t very dodgy. But that doesn’t completely nullify the science behind global warming, which overwhelmingly points the finger of blame at mankind. (It really, really does, by the way – and no British scientific body or international body of any standing disagrees. Forget East Anglia, we’re talking about Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale…)
It was something of a relief, then, to see David Cameron’s most recent email, which affirmed that the Tories haven’t been taken in by the rubbish spouted by sceptics: the Conservative Party rightly sees Copenhagen as a summit of “historic importance” and “an opportunity for the world to take bold action to deal with the real danger of climate change.”
But recent events – as well as the list of environmental best-sellers – show that the science hasn’t been successfully translated for the man on the street, and this is truly worrying. Even George Monbiot (Delingpole’s opposite number) admits that climate rationalists “are losing”, but he doesn’t recognise that the Delingpoles and Bookers of this world aren’t the only ones to blame.
We climate rationalists have to be honest: it’s also the Al Gore-style doom-laden depictions of climate change, the disingenous “climate models”, and the Left-wing myths which have helped to badly damage the climate change debate. It’s their nonsense that the sceptics and cranks feed off – climate porn, as Simon Retallack defined it in 2006, which unrealistically depicts climagte change as “an 18-rated horror film”.
So here’s what needs to happen. Lefties need to stop pretending that half of Florida is about to be submerged under rising sea levels, because no scientist really believes that to be the case. Righties, on the other hand, should stop ignoring the science, and should drop the conspiracy theories and the scientific pretence.
You know why this is so important? Because if we submit to the science, we can then properly start by far the most important debate: what we need to do about global warming. The Left is winning that one by a very long way indeed, and they’re laughing, because Delingpole and co. have led the Right to completely the wrong battleground.
The Next Post: John Demjanjuk should stand trial for his alleged war crimes, even if he reaches 112
The Previous Post: I’ve worked for the NHS – so don’t tell me to love it

Comments About Climategate won’t make global warming go away, despite what Delingpole tells you
// 5 comments so far.
Dr Phillip Bratby // November 30th 2009
Well young wet-behind-the-ears just-out-of-nappies Will. I suggest you go and earn a living actually doing something constructive in the real world and then come back and give us the value of your experience.
I guess in your own words you are “about as much of a scientist as you are the captain of the England rugby team”. Grow up, get some experience and forget about spouting garbage to those of us scientists who have been around a while and know a duck when we see one.
Will Heaven // November 30th 2009
It’s funny, when I noted that a climate change denier at Princeton university was an 84-year-old mathematician on my Telegraph blog, everyone accused me of ageism. Apparently it’s fine the other way around, Dr Bratby? …Something tells me your Ph.D isn’t anything to do with creative writing, by the way - a cliche every five words!
Dr Phillip Bratby // November 30th 2009
Absolutely nothing to do with creative writing, everything to do with the science behind the climate. What do you think to my suggestions, young whippersnapper?
Clothcap // December 01st 2009
Will, how did you become indoctrinated in the evidence light alarmism team? Through your own reading or others’ bluster?
CO2 does not and cannot drive warming. As for the cool period mid 40s to late 70s so for this cool period, CO2 and T have the opposite sign. CO2 drives cooling???
The whole carbon dioxide pitch has been a scam since the ice cores showed T moves first then CO2 later.
It is difficult not to be polarised and both sides’ web sites are as bad as each other at propaganda and bluster. It isn’t impossible to discern the facts though. You have to read both sides’ articles. If you could bring yourself to do so I’m sure you would be less supportive of the socialist warmista movement.
The problem with climategate is that the scientists involved are those mainly responsible for getting us into the political fix we are in. At the very least they should be banned from science. The IPCC assessments are now just so much toilet paper. There is no need for the IPCC but if they manage to cling on, another assessment with apolitical scientists and some form of check is the minimum. Windfarm subsidies should be stopped immediately. Green police (the various green bureaucratic depts) should be laid off. Compensation should be paid to each person who has suffered financially due to the fiasco.
Read this if you want to know where eulab at the behest of the EU will go next.
“Revealed: the UK government strategy for personal carbon rations”
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/20/revealed-the-uk-government-strategy-for-personal-carbon-rations/
Janet Holmes // December 04th 2009
Willie, what happened to the hundreds of comments from the first time you posted this? It was the best part of your article. Certainly the most informative.
You can follow any responses to this entry via its RSS comments feed. You may also leave a trackback by clicking this link.